One of the things I said at the Texas Constitutional Enforcement Legislative Agenda Workshop on November 9, 2024 was that there was going to be so much good happening in DC in 2025 that maintaining focus on what needs to be done in the Texas Legislature during the 89^th Legislature was going to be difficult.

I spent my time this morning and into early afternoon focusing on the joyous celebration of “Liberation Day” in DC. But it is time to focus on the ball we can have influence over here in Texas, and not only do we have bills to get filed and research to do in the Texas Legislature, we have a big day or days later this week that will focus on much needed reforms of the Texas House when the housekeeping resolution and rules are debated and passed.

Although, I have posted on social media about the results in the speaker race on January 14, I have not updated those of you reading my emails on those results and my thoughts on the outcome. I do so at the bottom of this communication.

We Still Have a Shot at Reforming the Texas House!

I have said along the way that the RPT Legislative Priority of No Democrat Chairs is a smaller, more understandable piece of the larger list of reforms needed in the Texas House. The overall goal of reform is to increase the power of the voters via increasing each individual member’s power relative to the speaker. That by necessity decreases the power of the swamp which has historically controlled the speaker. The Contract With Texas laid out twelve points of reform, at least 6 of which I think can be implemented by rule, rather than the practice of the speaker.

Three of the points of the Contract With Texas include requiring that the majority party receive preference over the minority party can be implemented by rule:

• Ending the practice of awarding the minority party with chairmanships (aka the No Democrat Chairs RPT Legislative Priority).
• Requiring all committees have a majority from the majority party
• Selecting a Speaker Pro Tempore from the majority party

We should be urging Republican Texas House members to introduce amendments to the proposed rules package to implement all three, as well as amendments to:

• Allow audio/video recording of all House proceedings, including point of order debates
• Reform the Calendars Committee to increase transparency and accountability
• Prohibit distribution of political funds from the speaker

I would also like to see an amendment to allow a discharge of a bill from committee to be rapidly placed on the Calendar if a sufficient number of House members support such a move. It was pointed out that establishment Republican chairs blocked lots of conservative legislation and RPT priorities last session. A discharge rule can counter that.

A Rule Implementing the No Dem Chairs Priority Can Pass

The No Dem Chairs Legislative Priority Committee focused its efforts on helping pick a speaker committed to reform, including the No Dem Chairs reform, because the committee members figured that having a speaker committed to that priority was the most likely way to implement it.

Along the way, the RPT and grassroots realized that it was, in the words of RPT Chair Abraham George, “not too much to ask” to ask Republican members of the Texas House to support the rules of their own caucus (and RPT platform) designed to unite Republicans to pick a speaker instead allowing Democrats to pick the speaker as was done on January 14. In fact, the SREC and a large number of county GOP organizations around the state declared aligning with Democrats instead of Republicans to pick a speaker to be a betrayal and a censurable act.

Some county GOP organizations, like Bastrop County’s resolution, went further and declared that both voting with Dems AND voting against No Dem Chairs to both be censurable acts. I am fairly confident that the overwhelming body of the SREC sees it that way, too.

Interestingly, a number of Burrows team members have said they planned to vote for Burrows, but if given a chance, will vote for No Dem Chairs. Burrows, himself, has implied that he, unlike Phelan, will not engage in Phelan parliamentary tricky-tricks to squelch a vote, and will allow a vote this session on No Dem Chairs this week. Burrows members steaming about the pressure and condemnation they received for their speaker vote betrayal are eager to try to blunt the anger against them by casting a vote for No Dem Chairs. We will see whether there are enough Burrows betrayers who think that way who will be allowed to put the amendment over the top.

I will not go into the details of the tricky trick pulled by Charlie Geren and Dade Phelan last session to stop a vote on No Dem Chairs. I know that grassroots members are debating how to act so that the play run in the last war by the establishment is not successfully run again. If all else fails, I know there will be more than ten members who will challenge the ruling of the chair if the play is run again. And THAT vote will be used as a proxy when the RPT is considering what constitutes censurable acts.

Analysis of Bills and Drafting of Bills Ongoing While Likelihood of Conservative Success Debated

After the speaker vote, I had conversations with a number of grassroots House members and activists, trying to predict how this session will play out, given the results of the speaker race.

I have pointed out that when the grassroots stayed engaged last session, we delivered some impressive gains last session, even though we did not get everything we want. It is my impression that the grassroots are ready to engage even more in this session to see that the RPT priorities and other conservative legislation is accomplished. There are lots more Texas House members that will be working together to see that happen. And many are saying that because of the primary targets on members who voted for Burrows, both he and his team might bend over backwards a bit more to try to blunt the current anger of the grassroots.

When people tell Steve Deace that he cannot succeed in pursuing a policy goal, he gives a sports-based response to the challenge, “Let’s Find Out!” My philosophy of action in the political arena is to repeatedly ask for what I want. I intend to do so this session. I intend, just like the Trump team in DC, to push as hard and fast for the reforms that Texas needs to prepare for the future.

I intend to make this a “Let’s Find Out” session.

Hopefully, next week, I can start laying out the details of the bills that I and my Texas Constitutional Enforcement group will be working.

The Results of the Speaker Race and Grassroots Energy for the Next Primary

There are many analogies that can be made to the long war between the grassroots and the swamp for control of the Texas Legislature. You can think about the WWII island hopping campaigns of the South Pacific or the advance of the Allies in the WWII European Theater.

I am not sure about whether the speaker race is better comparable to Operation Market Garden or the Battle of the Bulge, but what I know is that this speaker race educated even less engaged Republican primary voters about what goes on at the Capitol and the betrayals of them. The race has energized the base and identified the targets for the next primary season, guaranteeing that the 2026 primary and the 90^th Texas Legislature in 2027 are likely to produce ultimate victory for the voters and the grassroots. It may even deliver us more conservative gains this session than we would have otherwise gotten.

See below the best graphical representation of the second and final vote in the speaker race that I have seen.  The significant changes from the first to the second speaker race is that former Speaker Tom Craddick and Sam Harless, who had voted for Cook on the first round, switched to vote with Burrows on the second round. Interestingly the Dem candidate for speaker, Representative Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos, voted in the second round where she had been eliminated, for Cook, not Burrows. Of the rest of those Dems voting for her in the first round, 10 voted Present Not Voting or were absent with 12 Dems moving from Ramos on the first round to Burrows on the second round, putting Burrows over the top.

It was very clear from the nominating and seconding speeches appealing to the Dems that the Burrows betrayers set up the situation whereby the Dems picked the speaker. One especially outrageous, arrogant move since the vote is that at least two Burrows team members (Jared Patterson and freshman Jeff Barry) have tried to blame delivering the vote to the Dems on Cook and the reformers, saying that the Cook team following the very caucus rules and party platform that Burrows designed and to produce Republican unity and broken by Burrows and his betrayers, were the cause of delivering the victory to the Dems!

I have never seen a more aroused and angry grassroots, who are yearning to start the 2026 primary season. I personally have received more communications than I did after the Paxton impeachment, urging me to take on Stan Gerdes in HD 17 again.

I think I am going to follow the lead of Dan Patrick who was recently interviewed about the session and asked about the next primary season, given the result in the speaker race. He said that he was going to put that aside for now, focusing on delivering the best legislation possible this session. The key to long term success is channeling passion into productive activity.

This is legislative season, now. Time to respectfully ask for what we want now with the deck that has been dealt, keeping the eyes open and embers stoked, ready for censure and primary fights later.

As I write this on Sunday evening, Jan 12, it is less than two days until the vote on the Texas House speaker race on the first day of the Texas Legislature on Tuesday, Jan 14. At this moment, the outcome of this most fascinating and consequential race is not known.

Before I get into the possible ways the speaker race will turn out, let’s bring us up to date on big events that have occurred since right after Christmas, the last big summary I wrote on the race:

• One more Democrat, Richard Raymond of Laredo, has said that he should not be on the Burrows list, and has actually committed to Cook. This leaves Burrows with 36 Democrats he says are with him and only 30 Republicans that have not in some way indicated that they are not on Burrows list. Two Republicans (Jeff Barry and Janie Lopez are on both Burrows’ and Cook’s list without to-my-knowledge clarifying publicly which way they plan to vote.)
• Reports on X and elsewhere have been highlighting that current speaker Dade Phelan, wannabe speaker Dustin Burrows, and the Bonnen brothers (Dennis – former speaker and Greg - current Appropriations Chair) are owners with the big World Economic Forum implementers of their globalist hostility to the oil & gas industry, Blackrock and Vanguard, of Third Coast Bank. And that State Rep Cody Harris is their employee at the bank.
• The Third Coast Bank connection was publicized after Cody Harris of HD 8 in East Texas filed a criminal complaint for bribery against Republican Party of Texas Chair Abraham George. Harris’ ridiculous claim is that by using party resources to publicize the party’s opposition to a minority of Republicans aligning with a majority of Democrats to select a speaker and giving notice of potential censure for such is a criminal offense. So we now know that the employee of a globalist controlled bank and Dustin Burrows and Dade Phelan wants to put the Republican Party of Texas Chair in jail for opposing them. I posted about how such abusive lawfare violates our rights to petition for redress of grievances, free speech, and the bedrock principle of our representative republic that all power is inherent in the people here.
• Many more Republican county organizations have issued resolutions urging their representatives to unite with the majority of their fellow Republican party members and party to vote for the Texas House Republican Caucus. The resolutions are tracking the language of the State Republican Executive Committee resolution that warns that a vote against the caucus choice or a vote for secret ballot in the speaker race will be considered a censurable act. More than half of the GOP county chairs (and all of the most populous counties) have also signed onto a similar letter from Tarrant County chair, Bo French.
• Social media posts from Lubbock’s State Rep Carl Tepper were so disrespectful, not only of the Republican Party, but of the voters and the governor and lieutenant governor, that Dan Patrick issued two scathing replies to Tepper on X.
• Republican Party primary voters have been receiving a deluge of texts from PACs on both sides of the race and from the RPT on the Cook side. I detailed in one piece about how a text from HD 17 Stan Gerdes was filled with misrepresentations. The most frequent tactic of the Burrows supporters is to deflect from their betrayal of fellow Republicans and the party. Rather, they try to make a failed case that Burrows is more conservative than Cook, despite independent ranking by Rice University that shows Cook far more conservative than Burrows. In fact, if you average the Rice ranking of the Cook team versus the average of the Burrows team, where 1 is the most conservative, and 85 is the least, the average ranking of the Cook team (28 out of 85) is far more conservative than the Burrows team (47 out of 85).
• In another embarrassing statistic showing that the hypocrisy of the Burrows team on false messaging about the relative conservative credentials of Burrows, Grassroots America has done some analysis that shows nine of the Burrows team that voted more often with Cook during the last session than they did with Burrrows! That includes members Carl Tepper, Jared Patterson, Cole Hefner, Terry Wilson, Will Metcalf, Stan Gerdes, Gio Capriglione, Lacey Hull, and Jay Dean.
• Attorney General Ken Paxton and Abraham George went on a Republican Accountability Tour to four venues in two days, each seeing overflow crowds. Some paraphrased quotes: Ken Paxton: "We want Republican reps to vote with fellow Republicans to vote with the Republican caucus and Republican Party to deliver Republican results in the Legislature." Abraham George: "Is that too much to ask of a Republican representative?"
• Since this is the hottest speaker race in Texas history, it has received so much coverage, not only in Texas, but nationally, that I cannot keep up with it. Back during the scandal in 2019 which brought down Dennis Bonnen and caused Dustin Burrows to resign as the Republican House Caucus presidency, then Texas Tribune columnist said, “Former House Speaker Pete Laney once told a reporter that speakers are usually in political trouble if more than 10% of the voters can name them.” Phelan certainly passed that threshold with GOP primary voters. Burrows has now, as well.

One thing is for sure, the BurrowCrat betrayers have put the decision for who the next speaker will be into the hands of the Democrats. Neither the reformer/caucus choice group, nor the betrayer group has enough pledged support Democrat and Republican to get the majority of 76 needed if all members vote.

Currently, Burrows claims support from 36 Democrats and one Democrat has pledged to Cook. That leaves 25 Democrats undeclared between the two Republicans if the process reaches a two-way race between the Republican caucus choice, Cook, and Burrows. Those 25 can go with Cook, Burrows, or vote present not voting. The 36 Democrats that Burrows put on his list might continue to bleed for Burrows, either going to Cook or to a present-not-voting stance.

I do not have enough insight into how the Democrats will act. It is not just the Republicans that are playing the speaker race differently than last time. It is the Democrats, who have historically voted in lock-step, who are acting differently this time, as well.

Regardless of how the race turns out on Tuesday (and by the way, I have heard one member predict that the race may not be concluded on Tuesday, but continue on for another day or more), the culture of both the Texas House and the interaction between the Republican Party of Texas has changed. Despite the intensity of the wishes of the establishment-serving Republicans, that is not going to change back.

Even if Burrows or some other Uniparty speaker wins, conservatives will no longer be sidelined and denigrated by the Uniparty. Warfare between the reformers and the betrayer Republicans will continue throughout the session and then the 2026 primaries are likely to end many a career of establishment Republican.

A voter and member driven Texas House is coming. The only question is whether it comes this session on Tuesday, or after a mopping up action in 2026.

BurrowCrat Lawfare Violates Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances

Throughout this most fascinating and important speaker race in Texas history, the spokesman for the swamp-controlled group of Republicans backing the Phelan replacement, Dustin Burrows, have been displaying their contempt for their fellow Republicans, their caucus, their party, and their voters. But the latest and greatest outrage of the race became known, yesterday.

BurrowCrat State Rep Cody Harris of HD 8 that includes Anderson, Navarro, Cherokee, and eastern Henderson Counties filed a grievance/criminal complaint against the duly elected chair of the Republican Party of Texas, Abraham George, alleging that by promising that the Republican Party would campaign against Republican elected officials who go against the party’s principles and platform, George was engaged in bribery!

This charge, of course, is the essence of lawfare, which is the abuse of the law and judicial system to misapply the law to a political enemy. Of course, a citizen telling an elected official what he or she wants and making a statement of the intent to oppose that official in the next election is not the serious crime of bribery. Such false equivalence is Orwellian and destructive of the good.

I have seen people claiming that this BurrowCrat lawfare violates Abraham George’s right to free speech. While true, I think the most on-target right being violated is the right of Abraham George and the members of the Republican Party to petition for redress of grievances.

It took me a long time to understand what this right was all about and its importance to liberty. This is to talk about the right, its importance, its history, and how Cody Harris and his fellow BurrowCrats have violated that right of Abraham George and all Republicans.

First, let’s define the right to petition for redress of grievances. The Texas Bill of Rights, which is the one that is most applicable in this situation, has this to say:

Article 1, Sec. 27. RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY; PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. The citizens shall have the right, in a peaceable manner, to assemble together for their common good; and apply to those invested with the powers of government for redress of grievances or other purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.

The U.S. Constitution also includes a protection of the right from the federal government in the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law . . . abridging . . . the right of the people . . . to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The essence of the right is that you should not be punished when you ask a government official for what you want. If you are punished merely for asking for what you want, or for asking for it in the wrong way, the punisher is violating the right to petition for redress of grievances. Even when a person who is not arrested for asking for what they want, public condemnation, mischaracterization, and demonization of a person doing so is a violation of the spirit of the right.

Antonin Scalia said that when you are trying to understand the meaning of the Constitution, you should look to the history known and understood by the framers that motivated them to add a provision to the Constitution.

When it comes to the petitioning the government for the redress of grievances, there is no more concrete example of its violation than the Trial of the Seven Bishops. This story was solidly in the framer’s minds when they set up the original states and federal government.

This trial that concluded on June 30, 1688 with a jury delivering an acquittal of seven bishops of the Church of England was the crystallizing event leading to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 against King James II.

The story started with King James decreeing that all churches read a statement of religious tolerance to their members. The Archbishop of Canterbury wrote a letter to the king urging him to change his mind because they believed the king was not constitutionally permitted to interfere in religious matters. Six other bishops signed the letter and the seven bishops personally presented it to the king. For respectfully asking for what they wanted, the bishops were arrested, refused a grand jury review, and tried for seditious libel.

King James was really seeking to punish the bishops for asking for what they wanted. In doing so, he violated the bishops’ right to petition for redress of grievances.

The jury was stacked by the king, and three of the four judges that oversaw the trial told the jury that all the prosecution had to do was prove that the “seditious” letter had been written and therefore the jury had to convict. One judge told the jury that the ultimate decision was left “to God and your consciences.” The jury listened to the one judge and their consciences.

The trial and the resistance to the king by the seven bishops was the biggest news of the day, and throngs were gathered around the courthouse to hear the verdict. When the “not guilty” verdict came back, there was widespread rejoicing in the streets, and King James II soon left the throne.

In addition to the right to petition for redress of grievance, the other bedrock principle of our Republic is found in Sec. 2 of the Texas Bill of Rights:

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit.

Cody Harris is abusing his power invested in him as an elected official to squelch redress of grievances by the people of Texas. Other representatives on the Burrows/Phelan team, in their truculent language about the Republican Party and the voters, are violating the spirit of that right, and through their behavior are rejecting the notion that We the People of Texas are in charge, and that they are public servants.

There are many reasons why Dustin Burrows is not fit to be speaker of the Texas House. But this lack of respect for the people of Texas and his violation of the Texas Bill of Rights by him and his supporters is the most egregious of his failings.

This egregious behavior on the part of the core of the BurrowCrat team should cause any currently listed Burrows supporter to run away screaming from this train wreck, for fear of being tarred with the shame of this betraying, disrespectful behavior.

Although it was not sent directly to me, I have been told that the attached text was sent by State Rep Stan Gerdes to voters in the House District 17 he represents that includes Bastrop, Lee, Burleson, Milam, and Caldwell Counties.

The Gerdes text responds to the Bastrop County Republican Party resolution passed unanimously on December 30, 2024, urging Gerdes to vote with the majority of his fellow Republicans for David Cook and against the Democrat-supported Uniparty speaker Dustin Burrows (aka Phelan 2.0/Straus 4.0). See also this KBTX news report on reactions to the Bastrop resolution.

The text packs a lot of misrepresentation into a small package. Here is a list of those misstatements or implications with a correction using the facts:

Misrepresentation 1:  Burrows is the MAGA candidate for speaker -  This is the easiest to refute by displaying the attached post on Truth and linking to its X version from Don Trump Jr urging Gerdes to align with David Cook instead of the Democrats, claiming that the MAGA mandate that Trump led and which benefitted Gerdes demands that Gerdes back Cook, not Burrows. Further proof that Burrows is not the MAGA choice is that the statewide elected officials that have been the representatives between Trump and Texas, Governor Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Patrick, AG Ken Paxton, and Ag Commissioner Sid Miller have all backed Cook, not Burrows. Note that Gerdes is now going against Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick who endorsed him in 2024. And, finally, Burrows is the Dade Phelan substitute for the Uniparty swamp team that had been supporting Phelan. Trump, of course, was adamantly opposed to Dade Phelan’s speakership, so one cannot think that a Phelan-substitute like Burrows is MAGA.

Misrepresentation 2:  A Picture of Gerdes with Trump implies that Trump supports Gerdes – The over 8-year-old picture of an obviously younger Gerdes with Trump has been used to confuse voters that Trump backs Gerdes. Despite appeals from Gerdes’s patron and former employer, Rick Perry, Trump has refused to endorse Gerdes in both 2022 and 2024. Maybe the fact that the never-Trumper Koch-brothers backed PAC that was the primary source of backing of Nikki Haley also mailed in support for Gerdes in 2024 had something to do with it. Maybe Gerdes vote to impeach Ken Paxton and Trump’s vocal condemnation of that also had an impact.

Misrepresentation 3: The speaker race is about rural/small town v urban/suburban issues/values – This is easily disputed by looking at the districts and background of the Republican representatives in the majority for Cook and the minority for Burrows. In the majority Cook side, the prominent rural/small town reps are John Smithee, James Frank, Trent Ashby, Shelby Slawson, Caroline Harris Davila in neighboring Williamson County (Taylor), JM Lozano, Brian Harrison, Ellen Troxclair, Cody Vasut, Tom Craddick, and a host of freshmen, including neighboring Brazos/Washington Counties Trey Wharton and Paul Dyson and neighboring Guadalupe/Gonzales Alan Schoolcraft. In the minority Burrows camp are big city/suburban reps Carl Tepper (Lubbock), Lacey Hull (Houston), Morgan Meyer and Angie Chen Button (Dallas), Jeff Leach (Collins Co), Jared Patterson (Denton Co), Gary Gates (Fort Bend Co), Todd Hunter (Corpus Christi), and Gio Capriglione and John McQueeney (Tarrant Co). If you do a systematic analysis, it appears that the small town v urban/suburban mix is about the same in both camps. The real divide in the race is between swamp-influenced reps and grassroots reformists. Stated differently, it is it is between Republicans who prefer to ally with fellow Republicans versus “Republicans” who prefer to ally with Democrats.

Misrepresentation 4: “Billionaire special interests” “leverage” the Republican Party Against Burrows – Gerdes would have us ignore the log of billionaires backing Burrows and him to focus on the mote of much smaller funding by large grassroots donations for grassroots candidates and the party. People who live in glass houses should not throw stones. During the 2024 primary campaign, donors from outside HD 17 contributed 97% of the $838K in funds received directly or indirectly by the Gerdes campaign. Large donors (which I have called swamp donations) made up 86% of that total. In my failed campaign against Gerdes in 2024, I raised 64% more money from the district than Gerdes did. To think that the precinct chairs of Bastrop County that unanimously voted to urge Gerdes to vote with fellow Republicans and who are volunteers for the Republican Party are “leveraged” by some billionaire donors is laughably ridiculous.

Misrepresentation 5:  Gerdes Alleges That he Represents the Voters of HD 17 with his Speaker Choice – In 2022, more than 80% the Republican primary voters of HD 17 voted for the following ballot proposition: “The Republican-controlled Texas Legislature should end the practice of awarding committee chairmanships to Democrats.” In both the 2022 and 2024, the delegates to the Republican Party state convention voted to put “No Democrat Chairs” in the top 8 priorities of the Party. Although I have seen some Burrows supporters try to deny it, anyone who is paying attention to the speaker race and knows the history of the Texas House knows that the issue of reform that includes no Dem chairs is the heart of the issue separating the Cook reformers and Burrows Uniparty defenders. The surge for MAGA and Trump carried Gerdes to new heights in 2024. Does anyone seriously believe that the voters who were drawn to the polls to support the DC reforms proposed by MAGA and Trump were thinking as they voted down-ballot for Gerdes, “Boy, I sure hope my Republican state rep aligns with the Democrats and the swamp to select a speaker instead of working with fellow Republicans to do so.”? The very reason Gerdes used his campaign funds to fund the text is because he knows that the voters are against him, and he is trying to spin his way out of not voting as the overwhelming number voters in the district want him to.

Misrepresentation 6: Burrows is more conservative than Cook – Mark Jones of Rice University ranks Texas House members in every session from most liberal to most conservative in what is arguably the most unbiased ranking done of the Texas Legislature. In 2023, in his final, revised ranking or Republican House members, Cook was ranked much more conservative (37^th most conservative out of 85) compared to Burrows (74^th out of 85). In other words, only 11 Republicans were ranked more liberal than Burrows. Only 7 of the Republicans ranked below Burrows in 2023 are returning to the House this session. I would love to elect the most conservative speaker possible, and that is Cook, but the real issue of this race is which speaker is committed to move away from a despotic, swamp and Dem-serving speaker to one who will reduce his own power enough via reform, returning power to the members and voters, to make his ideology or opinions on issues far less relevant than under the Uniparty speakers of the last 15 years.

The political realities of the Texas House have changed. The misrepresentations of the swamp about what happens in Austin are being believed by fewer and fewer GOP primary voters. Will Stan Gerdes read the room and his voters? Or walk the plank for his establishment handlers? We will soon see.

Toward liberty,

Tom Glass
txce.org
Facebook: Texas Constitutional Enforcement

X: Texas Constitutional Enforcement community

Texas Legislative Priorities on Facebook

This is a third in a series of status reports on the Texas House speaker race that will be decided on Tue, January 14, 2025 on the first day of the 89^th Texas Legislature.

We have covered in great detail the results on December 7 of the Texas House Republican Caucus choice of David Cook for speaker, the boycott by the Dustin Burrows team, the fake news announcement from Burrows saying that because he had the votes "the speaker race is over," the blunders and bleeding of the BurrowCrats up through the last report, December 15, and the announced support for Cook and the Republican caucus speaker selection process from Donald Trump, Jr., Greg Abbott, Dan Patrick, 6 Texas Congressmen, the RPT leadership, and the grassroots.

The twelve days since has seen more good news for the grassroots and bad news for the beleaguered BurrowCrats.

Here are significant events since December 15, most of which that have more detail and commentary below.

• Matt Shaheen predicted that the Republicans would unite behind Cook before the January 14 vote.
• M. Lozano reminded the public and fellow Republicans of the back-stabbing behavior of Dustin Burrows back in 2019 when he and then Speaker Dennis Bonnen tried to target fellow Republicans in the 2020 primaries after declaring that no incumbent should help challenge incumbents of either party. That scandal caused Bonnen to not seek re-election and Burrows to resign his seat as President of the Texas House Republican Caucus that he is currently disrespecting.
• Three candidates have indicated they are challenging members of the Burrows team in the 2026 primary.
• A new PAC designed to target in the 2026 primaries House members that go against the RPT was announced and funded with $20 million by Alex Fairly.
• A poll was released finding “significant awareness” by GOP primary voters of the speaker race and opposition to representatives who enable Dem chairs.
• Several Burrows team members went public trying to justify their disrespect of their fellow Republican members, caucus, party, and voters. It did not go well.
• House members of the Cook team also appeared on talk shows and posted on social media in favor of unity.
• We now know that Dustin Burrows has been using his old close associate and retired speaker Dennis Bonnen to spy on Democrat Caucus meetings!
• More and more counties are urging their representatives to support the caucus pick and the party, many following the SREC lead, and clearly communicating that a vote against the caucus choice or a vote for secret ballot will be considered the first censurable act of the upcoming legislative session.
• Bo French, Tarrant County GOP Chair, released a letter calling the refusal by the Burrows team to support the caucus choice a “betrayal” and urging party unity via voting for Cook. As of Dec 18, French reported that he had 125 county GOP chairs signing. I know of more that are in the works.
• On Dec 17, Bo French claimed to know of 62 Republicans planning to vote for Cook. I try to keep a detailed list and have 55 votes for Cook with 4 uncommitted.
• On Dec 20, David Cook sent out a Christmas truce message, urging those within and without the chamber to cease fire on the speaker race until after Christmas. I forwarded that message on social media and committed to that gracious respect for the season.
• There appear to be more players behind the scenes sending text messages to voters about the speaker race than I can keep up with. Texts are even going into Democrat districts.
• The deadline for ordering Ban Democrat Chair T-Shirts to get them in time to wear them at the Capitol on January 14 is December 31.

Fact, Not Threat

In the classic western Chisolm, the John Wayne character confronts the big man that has been orchestrating a series of illegal maneuvers with the objective of gaining more wealth and power that has hurt John Wayne and his friends. Wayne tells the bad guy, that any future harm to others will be laid at the bad guy’s feet and justice will be visited upon the bad guy. The bad guy, asked, “Is that a threat?” John Wayne knocks him to the ground, and then says, “Fact. Not Threat.”

The grassroots have been repeatedly telling the Uniparty establishment of the Texas House that the betrayal of the party and the voters to the benefit of the swamp and the Dems cannot continue. Many in the Burrows camp have just survived a bruising primary season in the battle between the grassroots and the Uniparty with the aid of large quantities of swamp money. The money men behind them, their consultants, and their fellow BurrowCrats tell the incumbents that they survived 2024, so they can serve the Uniparty again and survive 2026 primaries, too.

On December 16, three candidates surfaced that are running in the 2026 primary campaigns against three members of the Burrows team:

Jon Bouche, long time grassroots activist, current Montgomery County GOP Vice Chair, and businessman, announced he would be challenging Will Metcalf in HD 16, who had pledged to support the caucus pick, but has betrayed that pledge and is on the Burrows team. Metcalf did not have a primary challenger in 2024.

Jack Reynolds, Fort Worth teacher, professor, and Army veteran, confirmed that he will challenge again the only remaining member in the House of the Republicans who put Joe Straus into power in 2009, Charlie Geren in HD 99.

Chris Woolsey, Corsicana City Councilman, filed to run against Cody Harris in HD 8.

But the big news making these announcements and others sure to come a fact that pain is coming to them, dropped the next day, December 17. Amarillo businessman Alex Fairly announced that he was funding a new PAC called the Texas Republican Leadership Fund with initial funding of $20 million.  That alone can easily pump half a million or more into the campaigns of grassroots challengers to Uniparty Republicans in 2026.

Alex Fairly has been involved in Panhandle politics and support for West Texas A&M in the past, but this announcement propels him onto the statewide stage. He is also the father of incoming grassroots freshman Rep. Caroline Fairly. Alex Fairly said in his announcement:

“In spite of the progress made in this past election cycle . . . toward conservative priorities, there may still be work to do in the next primary cycle. These funds will be available to help expand a true Republican majority.

Democrats don’t give their votes away for free; they want things in return. So, we end up with a House that’s not really run by the majority. It’s co-run by Democrats and a minority of Republicans. It puts Texas in such a weak position to accomplish what we could if we were truly led by a majority of Republicans. This time, we’re bringing this out into the light.”

And more facts surfaced to prove the Burrows team is being watched and disapproved by primary voters. A poll was released by Christopher Wilson conducted in five Burrows-supporter districts (Gary VanDeaver, Jay Dean, Stan Gerdes, Dade Phelan, and Jared Patterson), trying to determine awareness and sentiment regarding the speaker race. “What we found was a significant awareness of the race,” Wilson said. The range across districts was 62% to 76% of primary voters were aware. And GOP primary voters in those districts opposed Dem chairs in a range of 56% to 81%.

When You are Explaining, You are Losing

That is especially so when you are explaining betrayal.

Because the PR wars in the first week after the caucus loss were so devastating to the Burrows team, four members of the Burrows team chose to go public, explaining their betrayal of their fellow Republican members, their caucus, their party, and their voters.

Terry Wilson published a piece on December 17 for the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, the hometown newspaper of Burrows and Carl Tepper, claimed that the caucus is “broken” and the results “illegitimate.”

In one of my comments about this article on X, I said:

[T]he only substantive argument of the Wilson article was that the third caucus vote after the Burrows-led walkout was "illegitimate" because the vote "failed to reach the 60% threshold to secure the endorsement." But that attempted rationalization of betrayal fails because that is an incorrect statement of the caucus rules.

The very rule that Burrows helped write was designed to produce a caucus vote and intentionally made the threshold 60% of the "votes cast," (Rule 9.02) not 60% of the entire caucus. That provision, making it necessary for a member to be present and not abstain to have his or her vote used in determining the threshold was designed to prevent defiant losers from invalidating the process via the very walkout the Burrows team engineered. Cook won 77% of those present and voting (the votes cast) on the third round (48 to 14), making him the legitimate caucus endorsee.

The rest of the article was sore-loser weak sauce, claiming that communication between members before the caucus and having come into the caucus with a pre-determined choice was somehow beyond the pale. As if the Burrows team did not do that. The article also claimed the process “compromised” due to Tom Oliverson, the President of the caucus running the meeting, having his own choice for speaker. Other than the previously addressed misstatement of caucus rules, there is no claim to support that Oliverson did not enforce caucus rules.

On December 19, Cody Harris sent an email to his district, responding to what he called being “flooded with calls” regarding speaker (and obviously for Cook), admitting that he sees the speaker “fight” as being “about control and nothing else.” He accused grassroots donors Tim Dunn and Ferris Wilks of being “political terrorists” for supporting the candidates of their choice. Somehow, other big donors who give more dollars to the Uniparty candidates are not. Rep. Ellen Troxclair was on KLBJ Austin talk radio on December 19 talking about the speaker race, and pointed out that Dunn/Wilks money was used against her in her primary, and her support for Cook “has nothing to do with them.”

Cody Harris also claimed Burrows is more conservative than Cook, despite two independent, fact driven analysis showing differently. First Rice University’s Mark Jones final, recalibrated 2023 ranking of the Texas House from most conservative to most liberal ranked Cook much more conservative than Burrows. There were 35 Republicans ranked below Cook and ahead of Burrows. The Rice survey ranked Burrows as the 12^th most liberal Texas House Republican in 2023.

(By the way, I have seen one commentator on X use the first 2023 version of the Rice survey that showed Cook ranked just ahead of Burrows. The big difference in rankings is explained in the methodology comments in the second released survey. Saying that a recalibration was done “primarily due to the calculated effort this year by a small number of Republican House members to make their Lib-Con Scores appear more conservative than they actually were.”

By the way, I took the average Rice rank number of the returning Burrows Republican team members versus that of the returning Cook team members. A lower number means an average higher conservative ranking. The Cook team had the more conservative average rank of 28.1 vs. Burrows 47.4.

The other independent analysis showing Cook more conservative than Burrows came from a grassrootspriorities.com tool comparing who different incumbents vote against. See results here:

Democrats Learn that Burrows Used Former Speaker Bonnen to Spy on Their Caucus!

As Republican support for Burrows erodes, his need for more Democrat support grows more urgent. His campaign puts him and his supporters in the middle between the conservative Republicans rock and the radical Democrat hard place. When the Burrows supporters spin to their voters that they are supporting Burrows because he is more conservative, the progressives become more justified in opposing Burrows. Sure, they know that Burrows is lying about his record to the grassroots, but the Dems also know that whatever promises he makes about preserving the bi-partisan culture of the House may or may not be true. And regardless, they know that Dem chairmanships will only go to a few of the more swamp-oriented Dems, not the hard-core leftists that make up an increasing number of their ranks.

So, when Republican State Rep J.M. Lozano broke the news on December 19 that a former member of the body lobbyist had conspired with a current Dem chair to spy on the Dem caucus meetings and report back to Bonnen, a bomb went off in the already weakened Burrows campaign.

The next day, Texas Scorecard revealed that the spy was none other than Burrows old buddy, former Speaker Dennis Bonnen!

Plans for showing the RPT banner for speaker on January 14

Plans are well along the way by the RPT No Dem Chairs Legislative Priorities Committee. To sign up and pay to ride a bus to the Capitol on Tuesday, January 14, go to bandemocratchairsinfo.com. Also found at that website are links to purchase Ban Democrat Chairs T-shirts and find out contact info and status of which reps need urging to move to the Cook team.

The permutations of how a speaker gets to 76 are almost infinite. The key to a grassroots victory is to peel enough of the Burrows team and those on the fence into the RPT fold, so that the Republicans can deliver the 76 votes for the win, or a combination of Democrats and Republicans will deny enough votes to Burrows on the first vote in a three-way vote to knock out Burrows (or replacement) and produce a two-way race between Cook and a Dem.

That is why continued pressure from us on the holdouts is so important.

Toward liberty,

Tom Glass
832-472-4726
txce.org
Facebook: Texas Constitutional Enforcement

X: Texas Constitutional Enforcement community

Texas Legislative Priorities on Facebook

It's been just over a week since I reported to you the results of the Texas House Republican Caucus choice of David Cook for speaker, the boycott by the Dustin Burrows team, and the fake news announcement from Burrows saying he had the votes and "the speaker race is over."

I was hoping to coast through to Christmas and New Years focused on the season and the home front, but a torrent of activity has happened in the last seven days that needs reporting. I have to admit that this is the most fascinating speaker race in my lifetime, if not Texas history. The stakes are high, the permutations of outcomes numerous, and the drama, unprecedented.

The Burrows betrayer team has taken hit after hit this week, bleeding supporters, and losing every PR battle.

This picture is the most comprehensive picture I have seen of the Republican members at the Dustin Burrows press conference on December 7.

Here are the numerous events from the last week:

Burrows losing support

I don't have the exact running count, but it has been reported that 8 of the 38 Republicans that Burrows put on his initial support list have said they support the GOP caucus nominee, David Cook. And one of the 38 Democrats on the Burrows list, Bexar County's Josey Garcia, has announced that she should not be on it.

Here are the Republicans that Burrows put on the list that have said they should not be on it now:

Don McLaughlin HD 80 - this former Uvalde mayor who just flipped his district red was one of the original signers of the Contract With Texas and had pledged to No Dem Chairs and to Cook. McLaughlin immediately went public, denying being on the list. His inclusion by Burrows was the most outrageous.

Pat Dyson HD 14 - Brazos County freshman who had campaigned for border security, school choice, and eliminating property tax. Had pledged to Cook before the caucus and immediately went public, denying Burrows support.

Sam Harless HD 126 - Harris County - one of only 2 incumbent Republicans on the fake news Burrows list that voted against Paxton impeachment. Harless had not pledged to Cook before caucus, was one of the 26 who boycotted the third vote in caucus. But, he did not appear with Burrows at his announcement press conference, and just after noon on Tue, Dec 10, the day after a Harris County GOP resolution supporting Cook, Harless posted on X that he supports the "caucus nominee, State Rep. David Cook." This is bigger news than most because Phelan had named Harless chair of a select committee during the 88th.

Charles Cunningham HD 127 Harris County - had pledged to Cook before the caucus and likely voted for him in caucus, Cunningham was pictured standing with Burrows when he announced on Dec 7, though, while also being put on Burrows list, creating doubt and confusion. In the runup to the Monday evening Harris County GOP CEC meeting, Cunningham communicated to enough people privately that he backed Cook and not Burrows, that the GOP considers him to still be on the Cook team. Cunningham was the other incumbent on the Burrows list that voted against Paxton impeachment.

Mano DeAyala HD 133 Harris County - Did not commit to Cook before caucus and voted for Burrows in caucus, but had committed publicly before caucus to honor the caucus choice. In the runup to the Harris County GOP CEC vote Monday night, he assured enough people privately that he is considered by the GOP to be on the Cook team.

Gary Gates HD 28 Fort Bend County - Militantly committed to neither candidate until the last, Gates had vociferously not committed to Cook before Caucus. He almost certainly did not vote for him in caucus, but did not join the boycott or the Burrows presser. The media reported that he denied being on the Burrows list. Given the evidence, Gates will make his decision at the last minute based on who he thinks will win.

There are two others, who were listed in the Burrows list that are in question because they stayed in caucus for all votes, not voting there for Cook, but allowed Cook to put their name on his support list because they theoretically will honor the caucus rules and pick:  freshman Jeff Barry HD 29 of Brazoria County and Janie Lopez HD 37 Cameron County.

The Whole Conservative Ecosystem Rains Down Fire on Burrows

Donald Trump, Jr posted Monday morning Dec 9 on X:

It’s unbelievable what is happening in Texas right now. There is a group of so-called Republicans cutting a deal with liberal Democrats to elect a speaker instead of uniting behind the Republican nominee, David Cook! Unbelievable! Republicans have a mandate!

Lt. Governor Dan Patrick posted Sat evening, Dec 7:

Congratulations to David Cook who was selected as the Texas GOP Caucus nominee. Cook and his supporters did this the right way. His vote count continues to climb.

Ken Paxton and Sid Miller have posted multiple times on X in support of the caucus process and David Cook.

Greg Abbott's support for Cook came later and deserves it's own independent comments below.

Six Texas Congressmen have issued statements supporting David Cook and the caucus results: Ronnie Jackson, Keith Self, Michael Cloud, Brandon Gill, Wesley Hunt, and Tony Gonzales. 

Talk show hosts Michael Berry, Chris Salcedo, Robert Pratt, Sara Gonzales, and Kambree rained devastating scorn on Burrows and his betrayers. Pratt called the Burrows team supporting Democrat chairs, BurrowCrats.

The few members of the Burrows team that try to spin for Burrows on X that allow comments on their X posts are being hammered by a large volume of negative comments, urging them to vote for Cook.

Along the way, I heard some swamp supporters blame all the opposition to Burrows on principled conservative donor Tim Dunn. To that, True Texas Project head Julie McCarty said on X:

Let me get this straight...

100 County GOP Chairs want to follow the pre-determined rules and elect Cook for Speaker.

So does a coalition of US Congressmen from Texas. So does the Trump administration. So does the state GOP Convention. So do the majority of Republican State Reps.

So do the Governor, Atty Gen, and Lt Gov. So do all the grassroots orgs around. And yet somehow this is an effort led by one boogeyman who has bought everyone off?

Who knew Tim Dunn had THAT much power, money, and influence!!!

Repeated Burrows Blunders Boomerang

Burrows has committed a number of blunders that have created a PR disaster for him and his supporters all week:

• Boycott and Betrayal of Texas House Republican Caucus
• Fake news press conference saying "the speaker race is over" claiming he had the votes of "76 or more" votes. He then released a list with only 76 which immediately was proven to be incorrect and eroding.
• Announced big-buck fund raiser from lobby for "Speaker-Elect" Burrows! Phelan appointed Chair J.M. Lozano who was an early announced reformer opposing Phelan and now Burrows, sent a letter to AG Paxton asking if Texas law against impersonating a public official had been violated. The mockery online was devastating. Matt Rinaldi, for instance, changed his X profile to identify as speaker elect, too, claiming he had as much right to the term as Burrows. Burrows re-issued a new invitation to the swamp, removing the ridiculous title.
• Misleading text from new PAC with image of Greg Abbott and Burrows, falsely implying Abbott support for Burrows - this caused Greg Abbott to issue a statement on X denying his approval for use of the image.
• J.M. Lozano resurrected the story of how Burrows and Bonnen secretly betrayed fellow Republicans in 2019, reminding Republicans that he cannot be trusted. Burrows is indeed leading his team to walk the political plank that will end many a career if they keep on the same path. This led me to repost my article from 2019 commenting on the corruption of the Bonnen/Burrows offer to Michael Sullivan.
• Burrows Admits to Texas Tribune that he Will Appoint Dem Chairs - In a direct question on that, he replied:

This is what I've told every member, regardless of their party affiliation, and this is the traditionalist view of the Texas House, which is in respectfulness of the institution, which is what I am trying to take it back to.

By the way, I am told that the staff of Rep. Stan Gerdes, who participated in the caucus boycott and is on the Burrows team, is telling callers that Burrows is not for Dem Chairs, something that the Texas Tribune interview clearly refutes.

Greg Abbott Endorses the Caucus Pick, and by Implication David Cook

As people started digging into who was behind the new PAC behind the deceptive text with a picture of Abbott with Burrows, they discovered that it was created by Mitch Carney, who had recently served on the Abbott campaign and is the son of a key Abbott advisor, Dave Carney.

Not long after this news came out and after Abbott had denied knowledge of the deceptive use of the picture with Burrows, he issued this statement on X:

Let me be clear:

I worked this entire year to elect conservative candidates who will pass conservative laws, including school choice.

To achieve that goal we need a Texas House Speaker chosen by a majority of Republicans in accordance with the Republican Caucus Rules.

Given that around 22 of the people on the BurrowCrat side were endorsed by Abbott, that is big news.

Being the look-on-the-bright-side kind of guy I am,I praised the governor for being the peacemaker that will produce unity, harmony, and productive conservative results, claiming it was leadership at just the right time.

I was told by some that the reps that should be listening to the governor are not taking him seriously because they think he was forced into the tepid statement by the Carney link, and that they don't think he will back up his statement with any negative consequences if the betrayers ignore him.

I believe that if the governor follows up the X post with enough phone calls containing sufficient resolve in the message, he can, indeed, create peace within the GOP by moving the 18 or so needed of his 22 endorsed holdouts over to Cook and unity.

The RPT Taking Action and Deploying Funds for Unity

After the December 7 SREC resolution declaring a vote for a secret ballot or against the caucus choice of Cook on January 14 to be a censurable act, the state party has taken a number of steps to urge the Burrows supporters to unify back into the Republican fold.

The state party is running this network TV ad against the Burrows hypocrisy in Lubbock. Multiple commentators on social media mention that Burrows, as past caucus president, wrote the very caucus rule for picking the speaker that he is breaking.

The swamp is showing that it knows that the key to making impotent any threats against those who join the Dems is to count on the Republican primary voters who screen out political news to remain ignorant about what is going on in the speaker race. They know that they can spend big bucks to distort the truth and the record of those they support. As a preemptive move, at least two PACs backed by usual swamp suspects are sending texts to GOP primary voters in the BurrowCrat reps to give them cover and maybe a few positive calls to their offices to give them courage to withstand the fire.

The RPT understands this, too, so it is funding texts into BurrowCrat districts around the state, too.

The GOP chairs in the largest counties of Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, and Bexar are sending clear messages with their CECs to the reps in their counties, urging them to unite with the party. Bo French of Tarrant County has put out a statewide letter urging party unity, signed by at least 113 chairs and growing. Only the Lubbock County GOP has issued a statement for the Burrows speakership. Bo French said on X that David Luther, a staunch swamp supporter, Waller County GOP chair, and president of the Texas Republican County Chairs organization has been calling county chairs urging them not to sign the Tarrant County letter.

I know that many resolutions at the county level are in the works. Here is the Harris County resolution that can be used as a template.

Plans for showing the RPT banner for speaker on January 14 are well along the way by the RPT No Dem Chairs Legislative Priorities Committee. To sign up and pay to ride a bus to the Capitol on Tuesday, January 14, go to bandemocratchairsinfo.com. Also found at that website are links to purchase Ban Democrat Chairs T-shirts and find out contact info and status of which reps need urging to move to the Cook team.

RPT Chair Abraham George is reaching out to Burrows holdouts, giving them an opportunity to unite with the rest of the Republican world and move to Cook before he sends direct mail into the district in support of Cook. (On a personal note, I am very pleased with my support of Abraham at the State Convention.)

By the way, to those few Republican county chairs and precinct chairs who are unwilling to use the new Rule 44 to make the wrong speaker vote a censurable act, I said this on X this week:

You don't keep tyranny at bay by not confronting it. You don't have rule of law without enforcing the law. You don't get party unity organized behind a common liberty purpose without disciplining those betraying the party.

Given Democrat and Republican Disunity, the Swamp is Desperately Floating Numerous Tricks to Win

This speaker race is unprecedented in Texas history. It is not just that the grassroots and reform has gained the ascendancy in the Texas Republican delegation, thereby creating the GOP split between the swamp side and the grassroots. Even more interestingly, the Democrat delegation is divided, too.

Every Uniparty speaker from Straus, to Bonnen, to Phelan has relied on a unified Democrat delegation to deliver the win. But Burrows only currently has 37 of the 62 Democrats on his side at the moment. There is a far left Dem candidate, Ana-Maria Ramos of Dallas, running for speaker. If as Burrows gets the Dems to do what he wants and unify behind him, while keeping even only 14 of his current 29 supporters, he can win. But, apprantly, that is looking less and less likely.

First, some on the Uniparty side started urging a do-over of the Caucus vote, not realizing that that ship has sailed. The universal response by the grassroots to the mushy middle who just want us all to get along is that we CAN get along, if only enough BurrowCrats will unite with the entire Republican world in Texas.

Even more interestingly, three names are being floated as a replacement for Burrows who replaced Phelan. Why? Not because the Uniparty thinks that it can switch any of the current Cook supporters who honor their caucus, their party, and their voters away from Cook. The thinking is that a more liberal Republican might get enough extra Dem votes to put the Uniparty over the top.

The names that have been floated are Todd Hunter, who Mark Jones of Rice ranked last session as the 10th most liberal Republican, Ryan Guillen who just converted last session from being a Democrat and is ranked by Jones as the most liberal of the Rpublicans, and Greg Bonnen, the brother of former speaker Dennis Bonnen, who recently said that he thinks Republican House members are willing to "cut off their leg" to defend Dem chairmanships.

The permutations of how a speaker gets to 76 are almost infinite. The key to a grassroots victory is to peel enough of the Burrows team and those on the fence into the RPT fold, so that the Republicans can deliver the 76 votes for the win, or a combination of Democrats and Republicans will deny enough votes to Burrows on the first vote in a three way vote to knock out Burrows (or replacement) and produce a two-way race between Cook and a Dem.

That is why continued pressure from us on the holdouts is so important.

Toward liberty,

Tom Glass
832-472-4726
txce.org
Facebook: Texas Constitutional Enforcement

X: Texas Constitutional Enforcement community

Texas Legislative Priorities on Facebook

Click on the following for PDFs of 8.5 X 11 signs for display to Texas House Republicans on the way to their Dec 7 caucus meeting:

I have seen two letters, now, from constituents to Republican Texas House members, urging them to vote for a reform speaker of the Texas House and to vote to support the RPT legislative priority of "No Democrat Chairs."

The first was from an impressive 5 page array of community leaders in Tarrant County to Representative Giovanni Capriglione.

The second was from the Lee County Republican Party and Lee County Conservatives to Representative Stan Gerdes.

Here is the text to Representative Gerdes:

                                                                                                         November 15, 2024

Dear Representative Gerdes

Given the strong mandate the people of Texas House District 17, Texas, and the nation have given to you and other Republicans up and down the ballot to implement conservative change, we, conservatives from your district, urge you to vote for a speaker of the Texas House that is committed to reform. At the very least, we are asking you to make it clear to your constituents that you will oppose any candidate for speaker of the Texas House who supports appointing Democrat committee chairs.

As you know, the delegates to the 2024 Republican Party of Texas state convention voted to make “No Democrat Chairs” as its 4^th highest priority for this session. While respecting the Democrats’ rightful participation in the process, we view the awarding of chairmanships to Democrats to be a betrayal of your fellow House Republicans, of the Republican Party, and us.

We are also asking for you to commit to electing a Republican Speaker of the House through a Republican caucus election and to oppose any candidate who first courts the support of Democrats.

We believe these commitments are necessary to ensure that any future Speaker of the Texas House represents, and is accountable to, the Republican majority and its principles.

We realize that your top three donors (including the existing speaker) and your most significant patron will be urging you to vote for the status quo and Uniparty leadership, but we urge you to step up to becoming our representative instead of theirs. We note that you have a secret ballot in caucus, which we hope you will cast for reform and liberation from your sponsors. We believe that if you do, you will not need the support of those donors in the future, and that this legislative session and the primary in 2026 will be much more harmonious and productive, as well.

Sincerely,

Lee County Republican Party
Lee County Conservatives

Presidential Executive Orders for Constitutional Enforcement

What if a president took his oath of office seriously, exercised independent judgment about constitutional meaning, and started issuing executive orders (including interpretive reasoning) declaring existing statutes unconstitutional that order his administration not to enforce those unconstitutional laws?

If there is anything that the new DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) that includes Elon Musk, Vivek, and maybe Ron Paul could do to downsize the federal government, it would be to persuade the president to simply stop enforcing unconstitutional federal statutes.

The oath the Constitution requires any president to take is:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Early in our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court started with the self-serving assertion that they were final arbiters of Constitutional meaning. But the Constitution does not say that. That is an interpretation the Constitution. Using circular logic, SCOTUS has interpreted the Constitution to say that they are the final interpreter.

It is true that because SCOTUS swears the oath that every governmental official takes to the Constitution, each justice should use his or her best judgment to understand and apply the Constitution, but so should every other actor, including the president.

Madison and Jackson certainly thought so. They said so in messages to bills they vetoed. We degraded over time, however to presidents who refused to use constitutional reasoning in their decisions. George W Bush, for example, infamously said that he would sign McCain-Feingold and let SCOTUS determine its constitutionality.

The most earthshaking question a modern president can answer is whether his oath allows him to enforce statues, regulations, or judicial opinions that he understands to be unconstitutional.

To answer that precedent trumps a president’s oath is the way we have ratcheted ever farther away from the limits the framers placed on the central government. Once one set of bad actors in time have strayed from the limits of the Constitution, deference to precedent instead of the Constitution allows the Constitution to be perpetually violated and power to be inexorably centralized.

What are the most important constitutional principles have been violated over time that, if enforced, could create transformative change?

• Stop the feds from exercising unenumerated, undelegated power. (E.g., regulating the environment and engaging in education are not powers delegated to the central government, but rather are reserved to the states.)
• Reverse the complete gutting/replacement of the interstate commerce clause – the Constitution allows the feds to “regulate Commerce” “among the several States.” One of the worst SCOTUS decisions ever, Wickard v Filburn amended by judicial opinion those limiting words to allow the feds power to regulate anything “affecting” commerce.

Now may be the time that a president can set us on a new course that puts the power of the central government back in the Constitutional box. Executive orders by the president to enforce the Constitution can save the Republic and truly Make America Great Again.

On October 2, 1835, the Texas Revolution started when the government sent out troops to confiscate a cannon at Gonzales.

HD 17 Ties to Battle of Gonzales

The area of House District 17, which includes Caldwell, Bastrop, Lee, Burleson, and Milam Counties is intricately tied to that day, as is the situation we face, today.

When Lt. Francisco Casteneda arrived with 100 calvary to confiscate the cannon on September 29, 1835, he was stymied by a swollen Guadalupe River across which he saw 18 Gonzales militiamen, later called the Old Eighteen.

Matthew “Old Paint” Caldwell, of Gonzales, set off for Bastrop to sound the alarm. For that, Caldwell after whom both Caldwell County and the county seat of Burleson County are named, was nicknamed the “Paul Revere of the Texas Revolution.”

The Bastrop area sent two groups to Gonzales, one led by the commander of the Mina Volunteers, Robert Coleman, bringing 30 men, and the other by John Moore, bringing 40 men. Moore would become the leader of the over 140 men assembled to face off with Casteneda.

Sarah Dewitt (widow of impresario Green DeWitt) cut up the wedding dress of their daughter, Naomi, and created the famous Come and Take It flag under which Texas started its fight against the violations of the Mexican constitution by the dictator, Santa Anna.

After the first volley of the battle on October 2, which the Texans definitely fired, Moore and Casteneda parleyed. Casteneda asked Moore why the hostility. Moore said he was defending the decentralized Mexican Constitution of 1824 against the dictatorial consolidation of central power by Santa Anna. Castaneda said he was a supporter of decentralization, too, and Moore asked Casteneda to join with his group and fight for the Constitution. Casteneda replied with a familiar refrain of tyranny, he had to follow his orders.

Relevance to Today

At this moment in Texas history, we face as grave a centralizing threat against Texas self-governance as the threat faced by Texans in 1835. To insure that millions of our posterity will remain free in Texas will require the same grit and spirit of defiance shown by the people of Gonzales and Bastrop.

Globalist and Marxist tyrants who want to centralize power away from Texas to destroy everything Texans hold dear will not give up unless met with the original Texas spirit of resistance.

If there is anything that defines my political action, it is an understanding of the current threat to Texans and our future, an understanding of what it takes to defeat that threat, and a burning desire to engage the tyrannical, centralist enemy to secure the liberty of Texans today and in the future.

The picture is an amalgamation of the original Come and Take it flag with modern versions of it, expressing our need to stop tyrants from taking our guns, using the Great Reset and climate hoax to destroy the Texas economy, and defiance against the feds trying to stop us from defending ourselves against the border invasion.

I am descendant of Scotch-Irish cattle drivers, a Texas Aggie that went to Ivy League grad school, and I know history, so I am beginning to dig into the life and perspective of JD Vance.  I have not read his book yet, but intend to.

There is a common refrain throughout history whereby some individuals seek to gain self-esteem by lording it over others because they think themselves smarter, more sophisticated, or otherwise superior to others.

One of the dimensions the social divide takes place in is between urban “sophisticates” and rural “hicks.” It takes place between New York / Massachusetts, etc. and Texas. It takes place between D.C. and the rest of the country.

The snobbery takes place between progressives and liberty lovers. It takes place between the media and conservatives. It takes place between the young and older generations. And all of that is exploited for sales in marketing campaigns and by the entertainment industry.

Even the term Whigs and Tories in the founding days of the Republic show this divide. Whigs were what the founding fathers who fought the American Revolution considered themselves to be. About a century before the American Revolution, the liberty activists in London called themselves the Green Ribbon Club. Algernon Sidney, John Locke and his patron, Anthony Ashley Cooper (the First Earl of Shaftesbury) were part of the Green Ribbon Club, so named in the Interregnum because those who fought for liberty and to get rid of Charles I and then Cromwell, wore green ribbons on their arms to show their devotion to liberty.

The enemies of the liberty champions were devotees and sycophants to the King. Those who got access to the King, of course, were sophisticated and in the know. They, of course, were superior to and deserving of ruling over other men. It was the King’s men, the Tories, who came up with a pejorative nickname for the liberty-loving Green Ribbon Club.

The name was whigamore. A whigamore was a Scottish cattle driver. In other words to the anointed King’s sophisticates, liberty devotees were hicks, rubes, unsophisticates, Aggies, deplorables, and bitter clingers.

In this October 2016 video interview of JD Vance after the release of his book, he talks about the reaction of “his people,” the Scotch Irish to the elites and their love of Trump.

I, like an increasing numbers of Americans whether Scotch-Irish or not, understand that the globalists and west and east coast elites are trying to undermine the fundamental American idea that the people rule here.  That idea is expressed in the Texas Bill of Rights, Art. 1, Sec. 2:

“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit.”

The 2024 general election at all levels is about whether the elites will continue their counter-revolution of control of America and Texas, or whether we start heading back to our founding principles of citizen-directed government.  It was also why I ran for the Texas House, because I see the elites controlling that institution and the current occupant of my district’s seat.  I am also optimistic about the prospects of wresting control of the Texas House away from the elites in January.

Like JD Vance (and maybe even more so), I am driven to put the people back in charge and take it from the elites who would rule us.  Like JD Vance, I have seen the elites up front and personal in an Ivy League graduate school.  I know that I was not recruited into the elite’s ranks by that experience.  And I hope JD Vance is like me in that he is committed to the fundamental American idea that We the People are capable of running our own lives, and that of our government.

Flippable Texas House Seats in 2024

The political winds are swirling around in 2024. For several reasons, I plan to focus until November 5, 2024 on Texas House seats that can possibly flip from Democrat today to Republican.

During my GOP primary campaign for Texas House, I said that the weak link in defending against the war on Texas by the feds and globalists is the swamp-controlled Texas House. The total number of elected Texas House Republicans is an important variable in the Speaker race which will determine whether the grip of the Austin swamp on the Texas House can be broken.

I call it Speaker Math. The question is how many Republican Betrayers does it take to join with Democrats to put in a swampy, Uniparty Speaker?  The formula is B (Betrayers needed) = R (total Republicans in the Texas House) – 74.

Currently, there are 86 Republicans in the Texas House.  So, the GOP Betrayers needed is 12.  (Joe Straus and Charlie Geren only needed 11 Betrayers in 2009 to start Uniparty control hostile to conservatives.)  If we flip a net two seats to Republican in November, R will be 88, and Betrayers needed is 14.  Every extra flip makes it harder for the Uniparty to keep power in the next legislative session.  (If the 46 Republican House candidates that have signed the letter to pick a Speaker in the Republican Caucus and vote against candidates who pledge to name Dem chairs stand firm, the Republican Dem-lovers will be forced to cast a record vote of their betrayal on the House floor in January.)

Given that the Dems favor mutilating and sterilizing children to enable their delusions, almost every Democrat refused to vote for a constitutional amendment to require citizenship to vote, and most Dems are soft on the crime that is devastating the voters in their districts, there is plenty of motivation for me to focus on flipping as many Texas House seats red as we can.

So what prospects are there for flipping seats in 2024?

I start with looking at the votes in the 2022 general election for Governor Abbott versus Beto to get a percentage vote.  I looked only at races where there is a Republican challenger in a district currently occupied by a Democrat.  In those races, there is not a single Libertarian candidate this cycle. The Green Party does not list its 2024 nominees for Texas House on its website. I doubt there is a Green Party candidate in these races, either, but conventional wisdom says that if so, it would likely pull votes away from the Dem.

Note that there were Libertarian and Green candidates in the 2022 gubernatorial race.  I made the simplifying assumption that Libertarian governor voters would more likely vote Republican for Texas House and Green governor voters would more likely vote Democrat.  So, the number of R – D  I am using for likely flip-ability in the 2022 governor race in the district is R+L-D-G. (I included the Abbott and Beto percentage vote in the district for a different perspective.)

I also showed in several ways whether the seat is open or whether the GOP candidate is challenging an incumbent. Normally, open seats are more likely to flip than those held by incumbents.

Remember, the percentage of people that have to vote differently this time compared to 2022 for a flip to happen is half the R – D value.  For example, if the vote was 53% D to 47% R last time for an R – D of -6%, just over 3% need to switch to flip the seat. Here is the list in order of “R – D” from highest to lowest:

I doubt that the anything lower on the list will flip.  In fact, even the bottom of the list above is unlikely to flip.  But for completeness, I include all other currently held Democrat seats with Republican challengers:

A more in-depth analysis is needed of each race.

When I look at the top nine GOP candidates on the list, it is very impressive.  Don McLaughlin is a businessman and former mayor of Uvalde. Robert Garza is an attorney with a lifetime of public service including being mayor of Del Rio. Denise Villalobos is a former school board member.  Steve Kinard is successful oil and gas financier with a strong interest in grid security and blockchain technology.  Doc Guerra is an OB/GYN doctor in the valley who has the experience of running the same race in 2022.  Rose Cannaday has served on the Irving City Council.  John Jun, an immigrant from South Korea, is an attorney with an impressive record of community service including Coppell city council and getting an education while supporting a family. Kay Smith is a universally admired longtime Harris County conservative activist. And Stephen Stanley has had a real estate career and served on the city councils of both Sachse and Garland.

Each of us should be looking to see what we can do to help the top twelve or so which are in our area of operation. I hope to be writing more about these important races as we progress.

Resolutions for County/SD Conventions This Weekend and State Convention

The Republican Party of Texas and its county parties have several important roles to play.  One of the most important is the bottom-up, grassroots process for creating its platform and legislative priorities.

The legislative priorities are especially important, providing a way for the RPT to become a key stakeholder in the Texas legislative process.

In this email I offer proposed resolutions that you may want to introduce in your county or senate district convention this coming Saturday, March 23.  I am writing to a statewide audience.  Some counties and SDs are already on their way in the process, having already had their precinct conventions. Bastrop and Caldwell Counties in HD 17 are in that boat.

But other places -- usually smaller counties like Lee, Burleson, and Milam Counties in HD 17 -- will have both precinct and county conventions this coming Saturday, March 23.  See schedules and locations for HD 17 counties at the end of this email.

See links to suggested resolutions associated with each title below and a bit of discussion about them.  You can download the PDF for use in your convention process.

Legislative Priority Resolution Suggestions

Because of lack of time, I will not provide rationale for these.  Hopefully the reasons these should make the priority cut will be already apparent.

Let Texans Run Texas Priority

Monetary Freedom Priority

Vaccine Freedom Priority

Axe Property Tax Priority

Election Integrity Priority

Grid Hardening Priority

Closed Primary Priority

Grassroots America/We the People has also put up a website page with proposed resolutions from conservative Texas organizations.

Platform Changes or Additions

Water Resources Plank Change

I think it important that all the counties of HD 17 pass this resolution.

Border Resolution

Another thing done at the state convention is to pass a very few topical resolutions.  Such usually gain national attention.  In 2022, the two that made it through Platform Committee and adopted by the entire State Convention called out that the 2020 election was stolen and censured John Cornyn for his anti-gun votes.

I think that this convention, the most important resolution we can have is to make a full-throated call for Texas to exercise our Article I, Section 10 natural and constitutional right to self defense against the border invasion even if the federal judiciary has entered a stay or opined that Texas cannot defend itself. Click here to see the border resolution.

HD 17 Convention Schedules and Locations

Lee County

I am the Resolutions Committee Chair at the Lee County Republican Convention.  If you voted in the Republican Primary in Lee County, I hope you will join us.

Location: The Lions Den, 1623 FM 141, Giddings  ( map )

Precinct Conventions:  10:00 am

County Convention:  1:00 pm

Burleson County

Location:  Cooks Point Community Center, 300 FM 1362, Caldwell   ( map )

Precinct Conventions:  10:00 am

County Convention:  following Precinct Conventions

Milam County

Location:  Milam County Annex, 806 N Crockett Ave, Cameron  ( map )

Precinct Conventions:  9:00 am

County Convention:  following Precinct Conventions

Caldwell County

Location:  First Lockhart Baptist Church Connections Center, 200 S Blanco St, Lockhart  ( map )

County Convention:  10:00 am

Note that to participate in the county convention you must have been already named a delegate at the precinct conventions already held.  Observers I am sure are welcome.

Bastrop County

Location:  Family Worship Center, 2425 FM 1704, Elgin ( map )

County Convention:  9:00 am

Note that to participate in the county convention you must have been already named a delegate at the precinct conventions already held.  Observers I am sure are welcome.

State Convention

Whether you are a delegate or not, you can present to the Platform and Legislative Priorities Committees at the State Convention at the Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center in San Antonio.  The committees will probably be taking testimony on Tuesday, May 20 through Thursday, May 23.  The convention starts on Thursday, May 23 and goes through Saturday, May 25.

Toward liberty,

Tom Glass

We Lost AND We Won!

The unofficial results are that Gerdes won with 57.8% to my 42.2%.  The votes for Gerdes were 14,136 versus 10,309 for Glass, meaning I lost by 3,827.  I am pretty sure that the mail-in ballots are not included in the vote count, but the 500 or so mail-in ballots will not make a difference in the outcome.

When I first thought about running for HD 17 in 2022, Kathie said that the most important thing was to change the culture of the Texas House in order to select a speaker in line with the grassroots. Last night, we did exactly that, and that is why I say “we won,” even though we lost our race for HD 17.

The “Weak Link” Has Been Repaired

HD 17 was just one battle in the establishment v. grassroots war raging in Republican Texas House primaries across the state.  I had said that if we won just ten or so of the 42 challenges to Paxton impeachers, it would be a gamechanger.

The good news is that we had a tremendous shakeup last night in the Texas House for the good!  Throughout the campaign, I repeatedly said that the Texas government is the strategic line of defense against an occupied DC that seeks to destroy everything Texans hold dear, but that the swamp-controlled Texas House is the weak link in our defense.  It looks like that will no longer be the case in 2025.

Seven Paxton impeachers lost outright last night.  Eight more, including Speaker Dade Phelan, were forced into runoffs.  Normally, an incumbent forced into a runoff loses.  That means 15 Paxton impeachers are in various stages of defeat.  When we add the five establishment retirees who did not seek re-election, one other establishment loss, and a Democrat seat likely to flip Republican, we are looking at as many 22 flipped seats!

The quality of the victors last night is incredible.  To mention a few:

• Mike Olcott, Parker County Conservatives founder
• Mitch Little, one of the awesome Ken Paxton impeachment defense team
• Shelley Luther, who went to jail for opening her hair salon during COVID to provide a living to her employees, and
• Janis Holt, former SREC member who represented the Colony Ridge area

Grassroots champion Matt Morgan defied all odds in Fort Bend County with the most impressive victory of the primary, surviving non-stop bombardment of lying ads on Houston TV and endorsements against him by Abbott and Patrick.  Wes Virdell, Texas executive director of Gun Owners of America, won the seat vacated by the retiring House impeachment manager.

They are going to rock the Texas House!

When Ken Paxton urged us at our January event to vote against three of the Court of Criminal Appeals incumbents who gutted his ability to prosecute election fraud in Texas, I wondered if he had enough clout to deliver on that request.  The person that does have that kind of clout, though, is Donald Trump, and Paxton persuaded Trump to endorse against them, too.  All three incumbents lost last night.

Gratitude

I can’t express enough how humbled and awed I am by the enthusiastic, sustained support of so many in this district and around the state.  My campaign was funded by you.  It was implemented by you with block walking, word of mouth, sign deployment, standing at the polls, and prayer.  We are a band of brothers and sisters working to save our posterity, our liberty, our state, and our nation.  There is a special bond created in such a fight, and Kathie and I will cherish the friendships and memories from this campaign for the rest of our lives.

The Deciding Factor in the HD 17 Race

This result is not what I expected, given the overwhelmingly positive feedback I received standing at the polls and at the door while block walking.  There is a lot of analysis to be done, but I have a few thoughts about why we lost that I will share.

The biggest factor in this race was Governor Abbott’s endorsement and support of Gerdes.  Abbott is tremendously popular in this district and across Texas, and his endorsement carried more weight with the swing voters that matter than Ken Paxton’s endorsement of me and Gerdes’ vote to impeach Paxton.  Abbott backed up his endorsement with at least $80,000 of ads on Gerdes’ behalf, something that Paxton was not able to do, given his need to spend so much on his impeachment defense.

Polling says that Trump’s endorsement would have countered and surpassed Abbott’s had I gotten it.  But Dan Patrick, for his own reasons, apparently persuaded Trump not to endorse me, despite Ken Paxton and Sid Miller urging Trump to do so.

I said at the beginning of the race that the crystalizing event for me running again was the vote by Gerdes to impeach Paxton.  I thought that would be an action by Gerdes that would alienate him from  voters, and it largely did.  I did not factor in that, while Abbott wants to defeat a Phelan-controlled House, he does not want to cede influence over the House to Paxton.  I seriously doubt that Abbott, Patrick, and Trump would have played the endorsement game in this unusual year without Paxton first endorsing.

The unpleasant fact of Texas House races in the Republican primary continues to be that the majority of Republican primary voters do not have news sources about what happens at the Texas House and overly rely on endorsements and advertising to make their choice for their state representative.

Money for advertising is not near as determinative in a two-way race where, as in this case, we had sufficient funding and ground game to get our name and message out.  Yes, $1 million dollars of big donor money came in from outside the district for Gerdes, arrogantly attempting to pick our representative.  That may have played a part in the Gerdes victory, but I think the Abbott endorsement and ads turned the tide from what was probably an early lead by our campaign, driven by our block walking, word of mouth, sign deployment, and advertising.

The voters have spoken. I wish the best for Gerdes and hope that he justifies their support.

Where Do We Go From Here?

Because our posterity, state, and nation need effective action to save them, I plan to continue doing what I can in that larger fight.  I hope that a lot of us continue working together in that fight.  Here are some of the ways that I want to keep going that maybe you can help in, too.  More details as we go.

First, I want to do what I can do to help fund and support the challengers of Paxton impeachers in their runoffs.  They are:

HD 21 – David Covey against Texas Speaker Dade Phelan (Jasper, Orange, Jefferson Counties)

HD 64 – Andy Hopper against Lynn Stuckey **  (Wise and Denton Counties)

HD 61 – Keresa Richardson against Frederick Frazier ** (Collin County)

HD 91 – David Lowe against Stephanie Klick ** (Tarrant County)

**  Governor Abbott has endorsed and is supporting the Paxton impeacher that has been forced into the runoff.  Note that in other runoffs, Abbott endorsed and supports the challenger because of the school choice issue.

Second, I intend to go to my Republican precinct and county conventions and seek to go to the RPT state convention and get the best platform, priorities, and party leadership we can.

Third, I want to focus on what we can do to insure secure elections in the big counties of Texas for the general election.

Finally, I want to start preparing legislation and strategies for the 2025 Texas legislature.

I don’t know about you, but when I prayed about this race, I prayed that God’s will be done.  Evidently, He has other plans for me and this district than what we worked for.  I accept that and will keep pushing forward.

I hope we get to work together in the future . . .

Toward liberty,

Tom Glass

The arrogant attempt of the big boys to purchase the Texas House is raging in Republican primaries all over the state. This is a report on my Central Texas area of operation.

Through the last reporting period, $700K had poured into supporting Stan Gerdes from out-of-district lobbyists, PACs, and politicians. I am getting word that even more is arriving.

This arrogant barrage from a few wealthy individuals who REALLY want to pick the "representative" from our district is turning the stomachs of a LOT of Republican voters.

I have raised $43K from the district from 168 HD 17 voters. Gerdes has only raised $26K from 49 in-district voters. You got that right. Gerdes gets only 3%, maybe less, from the voters in this district.

The big boys who want to run our lives want the voters to ignore that I am more experienced in business (including the oil business) and the Texas Legislature, more educated, more endorsed by trusted conservative groups, more independent, and more driven to save our posterity's future by securing our border and resisting occupied DC's war on Texas.

They want you to ignore that Gerdes:

* Works for a lobbying firm while pretending to represent us

* At the behest of his two biggest donors, impeached our border champion, Ken Paxton

* Is most influenced and installed and backed by Rick Perry, who recently said that it is "Sexy to be RINO."

* Was funded this cycle by the same billionaires that backed Nikki Haley against Trump

* Supports and is supported by disgraced Speaker Dade Phelan, both of whom support Democrat chairs in the Texas House. Phelan is opposed by Trump and supported by RINO Rick Perry.

It cannot be more clear that this is a race that will determine whether the people of Bastrop, Burleson, Caldwell, Lee, and Milam Counties will have a representative of us to Austin, or a representative of the Austin swamp to us.

Conservatives do not let their Republican friends and neighbors cast uneducated votes. The thing that will win this race for the people of HD 17 is word of mouth. Talk is cheap. Do LOTS of it this weekend and Monday before the remaining voters vote on Tuesday!

This blog was inspired by a social media post by a voter in HD 17, Marine, and father Michael Bastos:

Funny story, I ran into the mailman today on my way to go early vote after work. The dude no joke tells me that he can’t wait for the election to be over so he can stop putting these mailers in the mail boxes. I asked him who he was voting for and he said “sure as hell not this guy” and told me he was voting for Tom Glass. When I asked him why he basically said that he’s had to pass out so many of these things that he didn’t trust someone with enough money to send out this many flyers in such a short amount of time. These are just the flyers I had on hand to take a photo of, kinda over kill when you consider printing and mailing these things out can run you around $50K each time.

Here is a picture of just some of the Gerdes mailers he received:

For the record, here are the two mailers that my grassroots campaign was able to afford:

Tom Glass Campaign Mailer 1:

Tom Glass Campaign Mailer 2:

I arrived at the Bastrop County Republican Party meeting last night only to be told by many there that they had been barraged with glossy mailers from Stan Gerdes and the swamp entities that are doing third party mailers for him.

Some, who had not picked up their mail for several days, had three mailers for Gerdes in their mailbox.  Since 18 of 21 Bastrop County GOP precinct chairs have endorsed me, the crowd was not amused. I have heard similar complaints from those I greet at the polls.

Given that, it is time to talk about the warning I gave on the second of the two glossy mailers that my grassroots campaign has been able to afford.  On one, I said:

"You may get LOTS of glossy mailers from incumbent Stan Gerdes because the swamp is spending big bucks to keep their puppet in power. Mailers like this cost $16,000 or more."

In the second half of 2023, the swamp had supplied 83% of the money with which he is bombarding us.  Less than 5% came from the district.  We have not had time to analyze the money since then, but those ratios surely have only gotten worse.

Throughout this campaign, I have been trying to provide proof that I am the grassroots, MAGA, constitutional conservative in this race, running against a swamp installed puppet.  See the meme below for some of those arguments.

If you want a champion to defend Texas against the multiple assaults (including the border) from an occupied DC, I am the most experienced, educated, and driven candidate in the race, not beholden to the swamp.

The question remains for you, the Republican voter:

Do you want a representative of you to Austin, or a representative of the Austin swamp to you?

Can The Swamp Be Any More Obvious?

The Houston Chronicle reports that at a fund raiser for Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, Rick Perry joked that being a RINO is sexy.

(Photo by Kim Brent for the Houston Chronicle.)

Rick Perry and Dade Phelan are, of course, the handlers and patrons of Stan Gerdes. Phelan is the bagman for the swamp's control of the Texas House.

Phelan killed our most important border bills at the request of the Democrats and killed the bill by Senator Lois Kolkhorst to ban Communist Chinese from owning land in Texas.

This is why I say that the Texas House is the weak link in Texas' defense against an occupied DC that wants to take everything we hold dear.  And that to win against the DC swamp, we must smash the Austin swamp.

And it is also why I say, to save Texas, fire Phelan, fire Gerdes.  Vote Tom Glass.

Stan Gerdes, the freshman incumbent in Texas House District 17, works for a lobbying firm.

The firm that hired Gerdes in August, 2023 is Hance Scarborough LLC.  Kent Hance, current Chancellor of Texas Tech and who has held numerous elective offices as a Democrat is the Hance in the firm name.

Stan Gerdes is not an attorney.  His title with this law firm is Legislative Consultant. He has no known real-world experience in the energy industry.

This link on the Hance Scarborough page said that Rick Perry brought Gerdes to the job.  Rick Perry has been in the news, lately, endorsing against Trump in Speaker Phelan's district primary race.  Speaker Phelan and Stan Gerdes support sharing power in the Texas House with Democrats.

"The theme of my campaign has been that Stan Gerdes, the incumbent I challenge in the GOP primary that starts February 20, was installed and is controlled by the Austin swamp," said Tom Glass. "But this news which we just learned tells us more than that. Gerdes IS the swamp!"

"I have repeatedly said in the campaign that if the voters of HD 17 want a representative of us to Austin, instead of a representative of the Austin swamp to us. This latest news establishes that fact beyond all doubt," Glass continued.

Glass has previously offered other proof of the swamp control over Gerdes. The Texas Ethics Commission reports from the second half of 2023 show that the incumbent received 83% of his funds from the Austin Swamp, the largest donation being a group that pushed the Paxton impeachment. The second largest donation was from Speaker Dade Phelan, also a leader for impeachment. (See this Tom Glass blog post for more details.)

"I wish I had known this about Gerdes sooner," said Glass.  "I don't have a swamp PAC that will fund $6,500 opposition research on me like Gerdes did. I do have dedicated volunteers, one of whom alerted me of this only yesterday."

"To defeat the war on Texas and everything we hold dear by DC and globalists, we must drain the Austin Swamp," Glass said. "When you have an occupied DC, the Texas government is the next line of defense of Texans against the assault on everything Texans hold dear is Texas government, but the Texas House is the weak link in that defense."

"The Austin swamp wants to act like it is business-as-usual time when it is not in Texas or the US," Glass concluded.

I, Tom Glass, am the clear MAGA choice in Texas House District 17.

Anyone who is paying attention knows that the MAGA vote in the Texas House is for challengers to the Paxton-impeaching, swamp-controlled incumbents.

The Austin swamp is clearly funded by Trump-haters and the Texas House members they control, like the swamp puppet I challenge, Stan Gerdis, deceptively use that money to imply Trump support.  Here are the reasons why I am MAGA and my opponent is not:

• Trump said that border champion Paxton impeachers like incumbent Gerdes are "establishment RINOs" and need to be fired.
• Trump endorses against Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, the second largest donor to Gerdes. Gerdes and Phelan support Democrat chairs in the Texas House.
• Trump-haters that donate to Nikki Haley are funding Gerdes.
• The godfather of Gerdes' wife and main handler/promoter of him, Rick Perry, has endorsed on the opposite side of Trump in the Speaker Phelan race.
• It is not enough to remove Phelan. To drain the Austin swamp and have a MAGA Texas House, Phelan lieutenants and followers must be fired, too.

I created this meme to address the issue after a group claiming to support Trump called the Trump Conservative Club of Texas published a list of endorsements including me.

Note that this is not an endorsement from Trump. He has endorsed so far in only one Texas House race -- against Speaker Dade Phelan.  But he should endorse me for all the reasons listed above and more.